Exams & Credentials
Fact check of the content
Verifiable statements in courses are checked against sources by two models — when new slides are generated and on a schedule across the whole inventory; every case is recorded in a file that cannot be retouched.
الغرض#
A course that teaches something false does more harm than none. The verification chain holds statements against sources and knows, besides “supported” and “refuted”, also “unverified” — an unreachable server does not become an accusation.
طريقة الاستخدام#
مسار النقرCampusQuality & governanceFact check file
- 1When a slide is generated, its verifiable statements are checked before graphics and voice-over are created. If the check finds something, the workshop shows the slide and the narration with highlighting and a suggestion with clickable sources (الشكل 1).
الشكل 1 A recorded case: two checkers with their sources, below them the verdict on which statement applies and why. - 2The administration opens “Fact check across the inventory” (address /admin/faktenpruefung): “Last run”, “What is in the inventory”, “Register”, “State of development” and the schedule.
- 3Schedule: switch “Fact check runs automatically” on or off, “Every how many days?” (30 = once a month), “Objects per night” (a cost brake) and “Not before (UTC)” — then “Save plan”. It applies from the next nightly run (الشكل 2).
الشكل 2 The fact-check schedule: on or off, interval in days, objects per night and earliest start. - 4“Record inventory” → “Reconcile now”: reads courses, slide decks and documents, determines the owner of each and writes the register — without changing content.
- 5“Start run now”: immediately checks two objects of the inventory; the report names checked objects and statements, new findings, duration — and what was no longer checked.
- 6“Fact check file” (address /pruefkette/akte) shows every checked case: what both checkers answered, which sources they named and whether the statement really appeared there (الشكل 3).
الشكل 3 A case in the file: the statement, both checkers with their evidence and whether the statement really appeared at the source.
الإعدادات والمفاتيح#
لا يوجد مفتاح خاص في الفهرس — الوظيفة جزء من محيطها.
The findings#
- Supported and undisputed
- Accepted, but not beyond doubt
- Contradiction — a person decides
- Divided doctrine — both positions are supported
- not checked — for example because a source could not be reached; that is not an accusation
Ranking of sources#
- Primary source (e.g. legal text)
- Official interpretation
- Specialist source
- Other source
Register and responsibility#
Every object in the inventory has someone responsible — the owner of the content or, if there is none, the administration. The reconciliation states the figures: seen, newly added, retired, responsibility changed, responsible only via the administration.
If an object has nobody responsible at all, that is an operational error: the organisation has no administration account that could step in, and reports on this content reach nobody. The page says so explicitly.
Who may do what#
- Schedule, reconciliation and run: administration and operator.
- File: the administration sees all cases of its organisation, a lecturer only those concerning content they own — the database decides this, not the page. They may not decide anything (for example on “Contradiction”).
نصائح#
- Disputed questions are not decided but shown with both supported positions (“divided doctrine”).
- Sources are stored as an evidence copy in the source library so that a vanished web page does not take the evidence with it.
- “Every 30 days” is an illusion with many objects: the calculation of how long a full run takes with the set number per night is next to the field.
وظائف ذات صلة#
- LibraryThe institution's media library and the source library, in which every source is listed with an evidence copy and what it is used for.
- Checking and reviewing papersUpload a paper, have quotations and sources checked and receive a review with a grade proposal — the grade is set by a person.
- AI on the platform — what it may and may not doAI writes suggestions, presents courses and answers questions — labelled, bound to sources and with fixed limits: it does not assess exam behaviour and decides nothing that a person must decide.
- Content quality, quality reports and errataDeviations between course content and the current legal situation with deadlines by severity, users' error reports on slides and the error triage from preview and player.
- Quality and transparency pageThe public page on which the institution shows how it safeguards course content: seven checking layers, live figures of the last 30 days and a correction promise.
