Teaching

Checking and reviewing papers

FörLärare

Upload a paper, have quotations and sources checked and receive a review with a grade proposal — the grade is set by a person.

Prova själv

Varför#

Checking seminar papers, term papers and theses takes time. The platform takes over what can be checked mechanically and justifies every objection with a rule number from the guideline.

Så fungerar det#

KlickvägCheck papersOpen paperCheck now

1Open the page “Check papers” (address /dozent/arbeiten) and upload a paper: title, author identifier, type (seminar paper, term paper, bachelor's thesis, master's thesis, other), date the topic was issued, assessment round, length according to the module description, deviating supervision agreement, file.
2“Upload and read” — the paper then appears in the list as “read, not yet checked” (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1 “Recently submitted”: the uploaded papers with type, author identifier and status of the check.
Fig. 1 “Recently submitted”: the uploaded papers with type, author identifier and status of the check.
3Open the paper and choose “Check now” (optionally with “Check quotations (takes time)”) — this takes up to two minutes.
4In the review folder read every finding with its rule number and location and choose “Accept” or “Discard” (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2 The review folder: every finding with rule number, location, “Accept” and “Discard”.
Fig. 2 The review folder: every finding with rule number, location, “Accept” and “Discard”.
5Under “Assessment” read the machine proposal, choose the grade yourself and “Set grade”; before that the paper can be “submitted to the author for comment” (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3 “Assessment”: the machine proposal, the examiner's choice of grade and “Set grade”.
Fig. 3 “Assessment”: the machine proposal, the examiner's choice of grade and “Set grade”.
6“Download complete file” — paper, findings, log and the wording of every cited rule in one file.

Inställningar och reglage#

Inget eget reglage i katalogen — funktionen hör till sin omgivning.

Why the details at upload matter#

Topic issued on — determines which version of the guideline applies (rule 1.2).
Assessment round — all papers of a round are checked with the same checking tools (rule 1.3). A new round can be created directly.
Length according to the module description (words) — without a target there is no length finding (rule 2.4).
Deviating supervision agreement — if the text names a rule number, the objection to it is dropped (rule 1.1).

The states of a paper#

read, not yet checked
checked, findings open
submitted to the author
graded — the list then shows “Grade x.x”

What the review folder contains#

Findings with rule, location, objection and source; for each finding the examiner decides “Accept” or “Discard”. Below that “Discarded by the machine”: observations that the check itself dropped because they did not meet the requirements of a rule — they are listed there so that nobody has to claim the system saw nothing.

Plus the check log and a section “What was not assessed by machine”. The examiner's justification is a separate field.

Tips#

The grade proposal and the grade are in separate fields; there is deliberately no “Accept proposal” button. A person has to decide (Art. 22 GDPR).
There is no AI score for cheating — detectors provide no proof.
An image PDF without a text layer is rejected; PDFs with a text layer, DOCX and text are accepted.

Prova själv#

Skanna QR-koden eller tryck på knappen

Öppnar demorollen med fiktiva exempeldata — utan registrering.