跳到正文
免费试用

Technology & Security

AI on the platform — what it may and may not do

面向学生教师行政运营方

AI writes suggestions, presents courses and answers questions — labelled, bound to sources and with fixed limits: it does not assess exam behaviour and decides nothing that a person must decide.

亲自试用

用途#

Trust in AI arises from clear rules that can be looked up — and that are held in place in the code by guards, not only in a policy.

使用方法#

  1. 1Labelled: presenter and voice-over are visibly marked as AI-generated above every slide, with “What exactly?” for the details (图 1).
    图 1 The notice above every slide: presenter and voice-over are AI-generated, with “What exactly?” — below it the slide it refers to.
    The notice above every slide: presenter and voice-over are AI-generated, with “What exactly?” — below it the slide it refers to.

    图 1 The notice above every slide: presenter and voice-over are AI-generated, with “What exactly?” — below it the slide it refers to.

  2. 2Suggestion instead of decision: in the workshop nothing lands on a slide unasked; for papers there is a grade proposal, a person sets the grade.
  3. 3Bound to sources: answers in the course pass through a verification chain; what is unsupported is marked as such; the inventory is checked against sources on a schedule.
  4. 4Guardrails: attempts to get the AI out of its role, to query internals or to cause harm are fended off and logged.
  5. 5Choice of model: every tenant decides which language models the workshop may use; one of them works in the EU (Paris).

设置与开关#

功能目录中没有独立开关——该功能属于其所在环境。

Where AI explicitly does not decide#

  • Exam proctoring — the machine counts incidents, a person reviews and releases; a guard only allows the release at two places.
  • Grades — for papers there is a proposal, the teacher sets the grade.
  • Slides — generated images, graphics and texts are suggestions; only “Accept” inserts them. A guard prevents the route past the suggestion bar.
  • Competences — AI may suggest competences and assessments; only what those responsible for the course have approved takes effect, and a “demonstrated” needs several independent pieces of evidence.
  • Disputed facts — are not decided but shown with both supported positions.

Labelling under the AI Act#

The transparency obligation of the European AI Act (Art. 50) requires that people recognise when they are talking to AI or seeing AI-generated content. That is why the notice appears above every slide, lecturers' own avatars are likewise labelled as AI-generated, and the platform shows on its quality page how content is checked.

Every call is recorded#

Every call to an external AI or speech service goes through one single recording point; limits at 80, 95 and 100 percent ensure that a conversation ends in a friendly way instead of breaking off when the quota is used up.

提示#

  • The checking tool for papers is explicitly classified in the guideline as a high-risk system within the meaning of the European AI Act.
  • There is deliberately no AI score for cheating — and no machine that judges an incident in an exam.

亲自试用#

扫描二维码或点击按钮

该页面无需登录即可访问。

亲自试用

https://kurs.balzac-publishers.com/probe?ziel=%2Fdashboard

相关功能#

背景知识