Technology & Security
AI on the platform — what it may and may not do
AI writes suggestions, presents courses and answers questions — labelled, bound to sources and with fixed limits: it does not assess exam behaviour and decides nothing that a person must decide.
למה#
Trust in AI arises from clear rules that can be looked up — and that are held in place in the code by guards, not only in a policy.
איך זה עובד#
- 1Labelled: presenter and voice-over are visibly marked as AI-generated above every slide, with “What exactly?” for the details (איור 1).
איור 1 The notice above every slide: presenter and voice-over are AI-generated, with “What exactly?” — below it the slide it refers to. - 2Suggestion instead of decision: in the workshop nothing lands on a slide unasked; for papers there is a grade proposal, a person sets the grade.
- 3Bound to sources: answers in the course pass through a verification chain; what is unsupported is marked as such; the inventory is checked against sources on a schedule.
- 4Guardrails: attempts to get the AI out of its role, to query internals or to cause harm are fended off and logged.
- 5Choice of model: every tenant decides which language models the workshop may use; one of them works in the EU (Paris).
הגדרות ומתגים#
אין מתג עצמאי בקטלוג — הפונקציה שייכת לסביבתה.
Where AI explicitly does not decide#
- Exam proctoring — the machine counts incidents, a person reviews and releases; a guard only allows the release at two places.
- Grades — for papers there is a proposal, the teacher sets the grade.
- Slides — generated images, graphics and texts are suggestions; only “Accept” inserts them. A guard prevents the route past the suggestion bar.
- Competences — AI may suggest competences and assessments; only what those responsible for the course have approved takes effect, and a “demonstrated” needs several independent pieces of evidence.
- Disputed facts — are not decided but shown with both supported positions.
Labelling under the AI Act#
The transparency obligation of the European AI Act (Art. 50) requires that people recognise when they are talking to AI or seeing AI-generated content. That is why the notice appears above every slide, lecturers' own avatars are likewise labelled as AI-generated, and the platform shows on its quality page how content is checked.
Every call is recorded#
Every call to an external AI or speech service goes through one single recording point; limits at 80, 95 and 100 percent ensure that a conversation ends in a friendly way instead of breaking off when the quota is used up.
טיפים#
- The checking tool for papers is explicitly classified in the guideline as a high-risk system within the meaning of the European AI Act.
- There is deliberately no AI score for cheating — and no machine that judges an incident in an exam.
נסו בעצמכם#
סרקו את קוד ה-QR או לחצו על הכפתור
הדף פתוח ללא התחברות.
נסו בעצמכםhttps://kurs.balzac-publishers.com/probe?ziel=%2Fdashboard
פונקציות קשורות#
- Academic guidelineThe rules for academic work against which papers are checked — each with a number and legal basis, public and as a PDF.
- Fact check of the contentVerifiable statements in courses are checked against sources by two models — when new slides are generated and on a schedule across the whole inventory; every case is recorded in a file that cannot be retouched.
- Text models of the workshopWhich language model writes the slide texts can be enabled per tenant — three models from different providers, one of them processed in the EU (Paris); models that cannot be chosen are greyed out with a reason.
- AI guardrailsImmutable rules before every model call, a deterministic check of every input and a check of every output — with a log.
- Proctoring in examsCamera and behaviour monitoring during an online exam — what is recorded and why is stated openly beforehand; incidents are always reviewed by a person, never by a machine.
- Competence diagnosis (competence check)What can the learner already do, what is this assessment based on, what is still missing — and how does the course help in a targeted way? With tasks from practice, evidence per criterion and reassessment.
ידע רקע
- AI avatars as lecturers: possibilities and limitsWhat an AI avatar can do as a lecturer, how pre-produced and live-answering avatars work and which rules apply to labelling and consent.
- Data protection for AI in learning: GDPR and AI ActWhat matters when using AI in learning platforms: data flows, legal bases, prohibited practices, high-risk uses and transparency.
- Avoiding AI hallucinations in learningWhy language models invent things, and how grounding in sources, verification chains, guardrails and clear limits reduce hallucinations in courses and tutors.
- AI tutor or human tutor: strengths, limits, combinationWhat an AI tutor does better than a person, where people remain irreplaceable, and how to combine both — with rules for reliable AI support.
- AI literacy for pupils: what they should learnWhat pupils should know and be able to do with AI: how it works, critical use, sources, data protection, ethics and their own use — with ideas for lessons.
- EU AI Act: what companies need to know nowThe AI Act, Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, at a glance: roles, risk tiers, the timeline under Article 113 and what companies using AI should actually do.
- Article 50 AI Act: labelling AI avatars and synthetic contentThe labelling duties Article 50 of the AI Act sets from 2 August 2026: chatbots, avatars, synthetic media, deep fakes and AI-generated text.
